1. The defendant attached Form to the plaintiffs

2. The sum of the final claims in the damages list shall be described respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Daegu Airfield is located in the Dong-gu, Daegu Airfield. The area of the Daegu Airfield is approximately 1/3 of the entire area of the Do-dong, and around October 1970, the Daegu Airfield was installed at approximately 67,474 square meters. The Daegu Airfield is concurrently operating military aircraft and private aircraft. The flight is the main flight training for the F-15 K Trac under the management of the 11th M&A, the air force under the Defendant-affiliated 11.2) According to the appraisal report (A evidence 2.1) according to the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2011Ga76391 (GongGong) and 7 other (hereinafter referred to as the “related cases”), the appraiser A of the Seoul Central District Court of seven cases (hereinafter referred to as the “related cases”) for a fixed period of not more than 16 days in the vicinity of the Daegu Airfield (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul High Airport”) during the period from June 18, 2012 to June 28, 2012.

According to the first measurement of this case, the number of flights during the said period was the highest between 07:00 to 19:00, and the number of flights during the said period was operated on June 20, 2012; on June 27, 2012 and June 28, 2012, during the pertinent period between 19:00 to 22:00; and on June 28, 2012, there was no operation during the pertinent period between 22:00 to 07:00 and the weekend.

Aircraft operation of the Daegu Airfield consists of takeoff, landing, landing, landing on the ground, transit, and transit. The ratio by type of operation of the Daegu Airfield as a result of the first measurement of this case was 41.3% of takeoff, landing 30.7% of landing, landing 1.7% of landing on the ground, transit 11.9% of transit, transit 14.5% of vessel conference, and all aircraft take off and landing from the northwest to the southwest.

3) According to each supplementary appraisal statement (A evidence 6-2 and 3), the parties to the relevant case requested a supplementary appraisal on the ground that the annual operating ratio of the two directions on the runway of the Daegu Airfield in fact is 6:4 : 6. The parties to the relevant case actually demanded the supplementary assessment on the ground that it is 6:4 . The appraiser A of the relevant case is 3:3.3.3., 31., 2014; 4.1.; 7. May 7, 2014; 5 (3) near Daegu-gu North Korean Airfield, etc., Daegu-gu, etc., for the period of May 8, 2014; 2.