logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2013.11.19 2012고단1031
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The application for the instant compensation order shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two-year imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on July 26, 2012, and three years.

8. 3. A person for whom the judgment became final and conclusive and served as the deputy head of the Daejeon Daejeon Branch from October 29, 2002 to August 18, 2009.

1. On September 1, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C’s house of the second half-gu F apartment 103 Dong 304, 2007, stating that “The Defendant would return the investment amount by adding the interest of 11.43% per annum to the principal invested and the interest of 11.43% per annum to the principal invested even if the listing is known.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to make an investment in the above company or to return the investment money.

The defendant is against the victim of the same damage.

9. Around 20.20,000 won, around 10.20,000 won for the same year, around 50,000 won for the same year, around 0.11.0,000 won for the same year, and around 26.16.0,000 won for the same year, and around 40,000,000 won for each investment, was remitted to the Defendant’s bank account under the name of each investment.

2. On December 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s house as stated in the above paragraph (1) stating that “at the early time when a competition is not good and there was a legal dispute with G when intending to delay the listing of G. It is necessary to pay money due to a trial. It is possible to resolve the principal invested. We have 10 billion won of G deposit, and us will make a lump sum compensation at the time when the last day is settled.”

However, there was no fact that the defendant was proceeding with G at the time, and even if he did not keep the deposit of KRW 10 billion in G, he would return the investment principal to the victim even if he did not receive the money from the victim.

arrow