logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.11 2017고단3486
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 13:45 on December 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding the amount of food food increased to the Defendant who had been frequently on normal credit; (b) taking the victim’s bath to the Defendant; and (c) taking about 15 minutes of plastic materials used for cremation at the entrance of the above restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance between about 15 minutes.

"2018 Highest 617"

1. On March 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) told 08:20 on March 11, 2018, the victim FG operated in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, to pay money from the victim’s “G” restaurant; (b) thereby, the Defendant damaged the repair cost market by making the strawer, who was located there a wall on the victim’s own; and (c) making it difficult for the Defendant to pay money from the victim’s “G” restaurant.

2. At around 08:40 on March 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant on the charge of committing an act of assault, such as spashing the eggs at the above restaurant, which was reported by 112, including a slope I belonging to the Sung-nam Police Station H police station, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, upon the receipt of a 112 report; and (b) arrested the Defendant on the charge as prescribed in paragraph 1; and (c) the said I “this processed Paris spathn was not carried out; (d) the Defendant debrised the said I’s arms, spathn the I’s face, and spathn the I’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 3486"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Food receipt, on-site photograph, and credit account books " 2018 Highest 617";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 of the Criminal Act, which provides for the applicable law as to the crime.

arrow