The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant does not have obtained money from the victim in collusion with accomplices as stated in the judgment of the court below.

B. The lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable because of its excessive sentencing.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, in particular, the F's investigation agency that can recognize credibility, and the statement at court of the court below, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant deceivings the victim in collusion with C, D, etc. as stated in the judgment of the court below, and thereby deceiving the victim.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

B. There are circumstances such as the Defendant’s absence of criminal records for the last ten years.

However, in light of the background and method of the crime of this case, the nature of the crime of this case is not easy, and there is no agreement with the victim until now, and there is no special change in circumstances that determine the punishment differently from the original judgment in the trial.

In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit