(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.30 2017고단400

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.30 2017고단400

국민체육진흥법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who is not an entrusted business entity or a national sports promotion corporation of the Seoul Olympic Games or a person who is not an entrusted business entity shall not provide property or property benefits to persons who win the results of sports promotion by issuing sports promotion votes or similar things.

The Defendant, in collusion with one member B, C, D, E, F, etc. from March 2015 to August 2015, opened G (H, I, etc.) which is a private sports gambling site in the Republic of Korea and abroad from the point of not more than the Republic of Korea to the point of view of not more than 24 hours in 24 hours, and received a deposit of the sports game from the non-member of the name-based member who connects to the site with the site in the form of an influenite account, and charged the members with the total amount of the game money, and made members of the members of the above site be able to predict the result of the sports games in Korea and abroad from 5,000 to 1,00,000 won, and then, if the result of the sports promotion is predicted after the completion of the competition, then the cyber money was transferred to members by means of a considerable amount of money in advance and expected to be confiscated from the member’s own account.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with B, issued sports promotion voting rights or similar things and opened a gambling space for the purpose of profit-making, while offering property to those who win the result, even though they are not the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation and the entrusted business entity.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against J or K;

1. Application of the law of the police interrogation protocol to the defendant, J, L, M, N,O, P, Q, F, E, C, and Eul

1. The relevant provision of the Sports Promotion Act concerning criminal facts;

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2018.07.13 2018고단625

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.09.13 2017고단748

-광주지방법원 2018.08.17 2018고단1857

-부산지방법원 2018.03.28 2017고단6240

-춘천지방법원 2021.01.27 2020고단819