logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.01.12 2017구합66329
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on March 7, 2017 as bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. B entered a company C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) around January 2005 and worked in the new business development team from June 1, 2015 (the name of the new business group was changed thereafter).

B. At the time, C was promoting the participation in the installation of power distribution teams and the bid for repair materials ordered by the Katar government by organizing a consortium with D, etc.

However, as the representative E who had been in charge of the above affairs expressed his intention of resignation, C had B take over the above affairs.

(hereinafter “instant transfer disposition”). C.

B, on November 9, 2015, the first day of the bid-related affairs, and the risk inherent in the affairs is realized, the acceptance of the above affairs would not have been put on the idea that it would be difficult to take a reprimand, and finally, on the other hand, on November 9, 2015, the head of G, who is the head of the new project development team, expressed his intention to resign, citing the reason that the above affairs should help the business to be carried out.

C on November 11, 2015, newly designates a person in charge of the above duties. D.

B was diagnosed on November 16, 2015 that he was suffering from depression and expressed his intention to withdraw the existing intention of resignation and to take a leave of absence on the basis of this diagnosis, but C was rejected on the ground that the latter was already conducted, but C was dismissed on December 11, 2015.

E. B, after retirement, from January 16, 2016, she cut in her own neck at her home.

B attempted to do so in a flick manner, but he left a note that he is not able to take a good result.

F. The Plaintiff, a bereaved family member of B, asserted that the death of B constituted an occupational accident and claimed for the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.

The defendant is medically recognized as self-injury due to mental illness that occurred in the course of duty.

arrow