beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by the imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
Defendant
A The above fine shall be imposed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person engaged in driving of G private taxi, and Defendant B is a person engaged in driving of H-type taxi.
1. On June 22, 2011, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant”), driving a private taxi at around 23:16, while proceeding four lanes from eight lanes in front of a high speed bus terminal in Gwangju Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, toward the speed of about 77km from the luminous distance.
At the same time, since the rained surface was milched, the Defendant, as a driver, had a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving at a speed of 48 km or less per hour with a speed of less than 60 km per hour, the speed limit of 60 km.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected his duty to 29km above speed, and neglected his duty to cher front-time watch, and found the victim I (the 44 years of age) who was on the four-lanes of the above road late later, operated the steering gear to the left side, but did not avoid it. However, the victim's head head was shocked with the front front-way wheel of the above taxi and the front door of the above taxi.
As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim's inside and outside of the treatment days due to occupational negligence such as the above.
2. On June 22, 2011, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant”), driving a H-business taxi at H around 23:19, and driving the five-lane of the road in which the said accident occurred at a speed of about 65 km from the direction of the luminous shooting distance to the direction of the archa distance.
At the same time, since the victim was faced with the accident on the road as above, the defendant, the driver, had a duty of care to see the front door and prevent the accident from occurring.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.