logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.13 2015가합6383
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. 1) Defendant A’s KRW 4,233,286,503 and KRW 1,387,00,000 among them, Defendant B’s as Defendant A.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A, B, C, D, F, and G

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, the creditor is "Plaintiff", the debtor is "Defendant", and the debtor is brought an action to interrupt the extinctive prescription of the claim based on the final judgment).

(1) As to Defendant A, B, C, D, and G: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Decision by Service by Public Notice) with respect to Defendant F: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act (Decision by Public Notice):

2. In full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers) as to the claim against defendant E, the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Bankrupt Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation is acknowledged to have transferred the claim for damages under the final and conclusive judgment against the defendant E on Oct. 17, 2008 (Seoul District Court Decision 2003Gahap12574 delivered on Nov. 5, 2004) to the plaintiff and notified the transfer of the claim.

Therefore, Defendant E is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages due to the bankrupt’s bankruptcy trustee’s failure to pay the damages due to the Plaintiff.

3. An obligation to pay the money stated in paragraph (1).

arrow