logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.07.18 2014고정229
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A. On April 22, 2014, around 14:55, the Defendant was driving a CMATSER 2, while under the influence of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.163% at the section of about 300 meters from the front of the “comprehensive market,” which is located in Ischeon-si, Leecheon-si, the same time from the front of the “comprehensive market,” to the front of the “high speed bus terminal.”

B. The owner of a vehicle at the temporary border before the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but operated the two-wheeled vehicle, which did not purchase a mandatory insurance policy at a distance of about 300 meters from the front of the “comprehensive market” in the Hacheon-si, Ise-ro 1191 and from the front of the “Comprehensive Market” in the same city to the front of the express bus terminal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the state of the state of the start-up operation, and a report on the state of the start-up operation;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning black image;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the age of the accused and the primary offender who has no previous record, considering the family relationship, economic situation, health conditions, etc. of the accused);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow