Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for the crimes Nos. 1 through 5 in the judgment against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On February 17, 2012, on the 25th of the same month, the imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. was sentenced to three years and five years of suspended execution.

As pro-friendly relationship between the Defendants, Defendant B ordered the construction work of Defendant B (hereinafter “D”) and Defendant A received money from the victim E as if one of the Defendants had been entrusted with the subcontracted construction work, and Defendant A attempted to receive money from the victim by making a false statement as if he had been entrusted with the subcontracted construction work, and if the victim requests the victim to confirm the progress of subcontracted construction work, etc., the Defendant contacted the other victim and continued to receive money from the victim by having the victim receive money from the victim, even in relation to the other construction work.

Defendant

A. On May 27, 2010, at the “C” office located in Ansan-si F, it concluded that “If the victim pays KRW 15 million as the construction deposit, A would allow the victim to enter into a new construction subcontract agreement for G Logistics construction works in an amount equivalent to a total of KRW 2.6 billion for the construction cost if it is paid as the construction deposit.”

However, the Defendants did not have any capacity or intent to allow the victims to enter into a subcontract even if they received money from the victims as a security deposit because they did not have received any orders for the construction of the above G logistics warehouse.

Defendants received KRW 15 million from the injured party, from August 31, 2012, from that time, the Defendants received a total of KRW 68 million from the time to August 31, 2012, by means of deceiving each other and deceiving the injured party, as shown in the list of offenses.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception victim E and acquired a total of 68 million won through eight times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: