The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below, found the Defendant guilty by misunderstanding the facts, even though the Defendant could not have predicted that he could commit violence to others or damage another person’s property in a regradation situation due to the administration of phiphones because he did not have administered phiphones, and the Defendant did not voluntarily administered phiphones.

B. Since the Defendant did not administer philophones as a person of an unreasonable sentencing, the crime of assault, bodily injury, or destruction of the instant case was committed in a state of mental disorder not predicted by the Defendant or a state of mental disorder, which constitutes a reason for the necessary reduction or exemption of punishment, and the punishment (two years of imprisonment) imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On September 17, 2013, at around 10:00 to 11:00, the Defendant began to show symptoms of mental disorder, such as uneasiness, and the network, etc. after being mixed with the bridge at the bridge house, and as a result, on September 18, 2013, the Defendant committed the instant assault against victims I using two excessive number of 2 p.m. purchased at around 2:30 p.m. on the same day, and committed the instant bodily injury and destruction of automobiles against the victim D using the bl.m. at around 11:30 p.m., at the time of using the bl. phone, which was taken in, and taken place by the bl.m., the Defendant was able to block the said assault due to the bl. 3m., as evidence satisfying the facts charged in the instant case, as evidence for the Defendant’s use of a bl.m., Defendant 2, as the result of the investigation report by Kim K witness, the Defendant 3 p.