logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.08.14 2017가단20090
토지소유권확인 및 이전등기
Text

1. Defendant Republic of Korea: (a) Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, according to the attached inheritance shares with the area of 830 square meters wide and size of the Don-gun, Jeollabuk-do.

Reasons

1. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 14 (including additional numbers) as to the claim against the defendant in Korea, the facts of the changed cause of the claim are acknowledged.

According to the above facts, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant's Republic of Korea has a benefit of confirmation, and the defendant's Republic of Korea has a duty to verify that the 830 square meters of land size of the Don road in Jeollabuk-gun, Jeollabuk-do is owned by defendant B, C, D, E, E, F, G, H, H,H, H, I, J, K, M, M, P, Q, Q, S, T, U, M, X, M, Z, Z, Z, AAB, AB, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AK, AK, AK, AL, AL, and AM according to the attached inheritance shares.

2. Determination as to claims against the remaining Defendants except Defendant Republic of Korea

(a)as shown in the grounds for the change in the attachment of the claim;

B. Defendant B, C, I, K, R, U, V, X, Y, Z, AB, AD, AJ, and AL by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

C. Defendant D, E, F, G, H, H, J, L, M, N, P, Q, S, T, AA, AC, AE, AF, AH, AH, AI, AK, and AM (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow