logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2015.09.09 2014고단1122 (1)
업무방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, it shall be for 2 years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2014 Highest 1122】

1. At around 13:10 on December 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the said G by assaulting the police officer’s lawful collection and execution of duties on the arrest of flagrant offenders by assaulting the said G’s two arms and shoulders, by assaulting the police officer’s wishes to arrest the said D as a flagrant offender, etc., upon receiving 112 report as to the act of avoiding disturbance, such as taking the victim’s desire to D, who is a patient, within the original medical center located in the original medical center located in 387, the patient, within the original medical center; and (b) the police officer called the F Zone of the original police station, who was dispatched to the scene, upon receiving 112 report; and (c) said G’s attempt to arrest the said D as a flagrant offender.

【2015 Highest389】

1. 피고인들의 공동범행 피고인들은 2014. 12. 7. 01:30경 원주시 H에 있는 'I식당'에서, 피고인 A는 종업원이 술을 주지 않는다는 이유로 소리를 지르면서 소란을 피워 피해자 J(55세)로부터 ‘양아치 새끼들도 아닌데 너무 시끄럽게 한다’는 말을 듣게 되자 양손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡고, 피고인 B은 주먹으로 피해자의 우측 눈을 1회 때리고 발로 피해자의 몸통부위를 수 회 찼다.

As a result, the defendants jointly put up the right side eye in which the number of days of treatment can not be known to the victim.

2. At around 10:50 on March 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from the operator of the K District Station of the Kuju Police Station, who was dispatched by the Defendant, and was urged to return home from the operator of the K District Station of the Kuju Police Station that the Defendant 158 (school dong) drinks for drinking and avoiding disturbance; and (b) committed assault by means of spreading the relevant L’s working clothes, shoess, shoess, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, M, N,O, P, and J;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. CCTV-cap photographs and damaged photographs (Defendant B);

1. Part of the defendant;

arrow