1. The Defendant’s “request amount” in the list of the annexed land, etc. to the Plaintiffs refers to the respective money as stated in the corresponding part and each said money.

1. Details of ruling;

A. On October 20, 2016, the Defendant was an association established to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents in Gwangju Metropolitan City, Nam-gu (hereinafter “Rdong”) on the 44,251 square meters of Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Rdong”), and was granted project implementation authorization for Qua Housing Redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”), and the said authorization was publicly announced on the same day.

(Seoul Metropolitan City Public Notice T). (b)

The Plaintiffs were owners of each corresponding land indicated in the list of annexed land, etc. located within the instant project implementation zone (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant land”).

C. The Defendant filed an application for adjudication on the expropriation of the instant land, as it did not reach an agreement on the purchase of the instant land with the Plaintiffs.

On April 18, 2018, the Gwangju Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee rendered a ruling on the expropriation of the instant land by the Defendant, and on May 28, 2018, the date of the commencement of the expropriation, and the amount of compensation for losses as indicated in the attached Table “the amount of adjudication of expropriation.”

On December 20, 2018, the Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection (hereinafter “instant objection”) with the content that the amount of compensation for losses for the instant land should be increased as indicated in the attached Table “the amount of the instant adjudication” as stated in the said adjudication.

E. The result of this Court’s entrustment of appraisal (hereinafter “court appraisal”) was assessed as indicated in the “court appraisal amount” column in the annexed Table.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, result of a request for appraisal by this court, purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion is an additional compensation corresponding to the difference between the legitimate compensation for the land of this case and the compensation for the instant decision, and the plaintiffs are obligated to pay each money in the corresponding part of the claim column of the attached Table and the compensation for delay.