logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.02.07 2016고단382 (1)
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on January 12, 2012, the District Court sentenced A to one year of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on May 18, 2012.

Defendant

B was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on April 8, 2015 due to the charge of forging official documents at the source of the method of delivery, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2015.

[2016 Highest 2032 / [2032] When making a loan as a fund for the purchase of used cars, the installment financing company provided a uniform loan according to the type of automobile recorded in the registration certificate and the production year, and did not confirm the status of the automobile or the actual sale price of the automobile. The Defendants and D presented the registration certificate of the vehicle damaged to the extent that operation is impossible (hereinafter “the vehicle prior to the accident”), and received the loan and divided it as if they were purchased.

Defendant

B introduces E to D, and D requests Defendant A to provide loans, and Defendant A submitted an application, etc. for a loan of used cars in the name of H to the victim's Hyundai Capital by the brokerage of the subsidiary financial business chain to be integrated in the G Motor Vehicle Sales Complex located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon around April 8, 2011, and submitted an application, etc. for a loan of used cars in the name of H to purchase the I-to-be low-priced vehicle, the damage suffered from deceiving the victim as if it were to use the loan to purchase the 1-to-be vehicle in the name of the accident. The victim was transferred KRW 26,40,000 to the new bank account in the name of her mother-friendly J on the same day.

As a result, Defendants and D conspired to acquire 26.4 million won from the injured party.

[2016 Highest 2258] D is an employee in the middleest trading company of the trade name called "K," and Defendant B is an employee in the middleest trading company of the trade name called "L," and Defendant A is an employee in the middleest trading company of the trade name called "L."

Defendant

B around March 201, at a coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, to obtain a loan from a high school-friendly M from a high school-friendly M.

arrow