logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원정읍지원 2017.08.24 2017가단603
공유물분할
Text

1. The remainder of each real estate listed in the separate sheet after deducting the cost of the auction from the proceeds of the auction;

Reasons

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings submitted by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in proportion to the shares of Plaintiff 2/4, and the Defendants 1/4, respectively, and the fact that there was no agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants regarding the method of dividing the said real estate was established.

Therefore, the Plaintiff has the right to claim the partition of the instant real estate pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act. The method of partition is determined by the method of auction, since it is deemed difficult or inappropriate to divide the instant real estate in kind, considering various circumstances revealed in the process of the instant trial, such as the allegations by the parties, the category and current status

arrow