beta
Text
Defendant
A and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of two million won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to seven months of imprisonment for perjury, etc. at the Cheongju District Court on October 26, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 3, 2017. Defendant C was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for perjury, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on November 16, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2017.
[Criminal facts]
1. Defendant A was prosecuted for perjury, etc. with the Cheongju District Court on June 20, 2016 and was under trial (Cheongju District Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 1055) on February 20, 2017, at the G real estate office of Defendant’s management located in the Cheongju District Court located in the Cheongju District Court 2017, the Defendant was disadvantageous to B in the trial due to a transcript between B and H.
I was present at the time of the CC lease agreement.
At the request of the purport that “a request for testimony” was made, B made a false statement.
In fact, B made a false statement contrary to memory as in paragraph (2) even though I did not attend at the time of the lease contract of B.
In this respect, the Defendant instigated the perjury to B.
2. On March 7, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Cheongju District Court No. 423, Cheongju District Court No. 423, Cheongju District Court No. 1055, Cheongju District Court No. 1055, Cheongju District Court No. 2016, Cheongju District Court No. 1055, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and 62 Do-ro 51.
The defendant testified as "for example" to the question of "at the time of concluding the contract, I who is the defendant, the owner of the building, and the manager of the building C" in accordance with the teacher's building building A as mentioned in the above 1 above, and according to the attorney's recording document, according to the defendant's counsel's "the recording document, I or C did not attend at the time of the contract."
In doing so, I and C had attended the question “I have been present at the time of the contract”.
The public prosecutor testified that “the witness was a person who was present in the contract while leasing Cheongju-gu J 201, 3 June 201, 201, and who was a person who was present in the contract.”
“The question.....”