1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

1. The Plaintiff filed a claim against Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial for the repayment of loans amounting to KRW 600 million and damages for delay thereof, and the Defendant and Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial concluded with the Defendant on January 25, 2017 with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, respectively, within the limit of KRW 600 million, and thus, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of and compensation for damages for fraudulent act, jointly with Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial, seeking payment of KRW 600 million and damages for delay.

The first instance court rejected the plaintiff's claim against co-defendant B of the first instance court and dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant. Accordingly, the only part against which the plaintiff lost was appealed.

Therefore, among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the co-defendant B was separated and finalized, and the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the plaintiff's revocation of fraudulent act and claim for equivalent compensation against the defendant.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part excluding Paragraph (2) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts written by the court below, and thus, this is

(원고는 제1심법원이 피고의 선의 주장을 받아들여 원고의 피고에 대한 청구를 기각한 것은 부당하다는 이유로 그 취소와 원고의 청구 인용을 구하는 항소장을 제출하였으나, 이 법원 변론종결일에 이르기까지 아무런 항소이유를 제출하지 않았고 항소장에도 항소이유로 해석할 수 있는 내용을 전혀 기재하지 않았다). ▣ 제1심판결문 이유에 기재된 ‘피고 B’를 모두 ‘제1심 공동피고 B’로, ‘위 차용금’을 모두 ‘이 사건 차용금’으로, ’위 각 부동산’을 모두 ‘이 사건 각 부동산’으로, ‘위 매매계약’을 모두 ‘이 사건 매매계약’으로 각 고쳐 쓴다.

▣ 제1심판결문 3쪽 9줄의 ‘위 피고’를 '피고...