Defendant shall be sentenced to one year of imprisonment, and the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

seizure.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 13:00 on December 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim’s knife at the “E” singing room operated by the victim D, the second floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and the second floor; (b) placed the victim’s knife with the victim’s knife at the victim’s knife and knife that the victim’s knife, who was a knife, was at risk of being prepared in advance to the victim and his/her knife, for the reason that the victim had been living in the past. (c) placed the victim’s knife at the victim’s knife with the knife of the victim’s knife at the victim’s knife with the victim’s knb

2. Special confinement Defendant: (a) put the victim D and the victim F in a sing room at the time and place described in the preceding paragraph; (b) set the visit at six singing rooms; (c) display the knife, which is a dangerous object, as described in paragraph 1; and (d) generate a flame by using the electric wires with a well-known object; and (d) throw down the fire at the time and place described in paragraph 1.

“At the end, the victims were detained for about one hour, including the prevention of victims from leaving the above 6th room.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the public prosecutor and the police accused;

1. Each statement made to the police about D/F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, agreements, and penalties;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1), 278, and 276 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act for forfeiture is recognized by all of the offenses of this case, and the defendant is repented in depth.

In light of the method of the crime of this case and the degree of injury, the issue is heavy.

However, the victims do not want to be punished for the defendant because they have been smoothly agreed with the victim.

The defendant still has no record of punishment.

In addition, the circumstances leading to the instant case, and