1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Attached Form

Attached hereto with respect to the accidents described in the list.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the first instance court's reasoning, except for the case's dismissal as described in the second instance court's reasoning, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.Nos. 3, 18, 4, 3 to 4, 3, 3, 18, 18, 18, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4

Since a person participating in a sports competition may differ from other competitors due to his or her conduct, it shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances such as the type and risk of the competition in question, situation at the time, compliance with the competition rules, nature of the competition rules and degree of violation of the rules, degree of injury and degree of injury, etc. However, if the act does not go beyond the scope of social reasonableness, the liability for damages shall not be satisfied.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Da66849, Dec. 8, 2011). The following circumstances, i.e., that are: (a) the participants in the field of a camping competition frequently caused accidents that are fit to the public, and (b) there was no violation of the Rules on the Open Games in relation to the instant accident.

However, D had a duty of care to keep the Defendant from having been on the west in the same direction, and it seems that D had a duty of care to keep the Defendant from having been on the west in the same direction. Nevertheless, due to negligence and negligence, D sent the Defendant’s inner part of the Defendant.