Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Daegu District Court on March 2, 2007; on April 4, 2007, the Daegu District Court issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act; on April 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 8 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daegu District Court on April 19, 2013; on April 3, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a period of 8 months; and on April 3, 2015, the Defendant was subject to a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daegu District Court on April 3, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

Although the Defendant had been able to violate the provision prohibiting drunk driving under the Road Traffic Act more than twice, at around 04:18 on March 30, 2019, the Defendant transponed D with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.111% in the 2km section from the front of the Daebong Library located in the Jung-gu Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front road located in the Daegu-gu Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, and driven a motor vehicle.

"2019 Highest 2676"

1. On May 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 01:30 on May 2, 2019, committed as if the Defendant would normally pay liquor to the victim F in Daegu-dong-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the alcoholic beverage price normally, such as the absence of 80,000 won in cash at the time.

Nevertheless, it is clear that the Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving it from the victim, "240,000,000 won" is a clerical error of "240,000 won" in the facts charged in the market price of KRW 240,00.

Since there is no impediment to the defendant's right of defense, correction shall be made ex officio.

A considerable amount of alcoholic beverage, al. was provided.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that he had a time, place, or liquor payment problem as referred to in the preceding paragraph.