logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2011.09.21 2010고단602 (1)
변호사법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On January 18, 2009, the summary of the facts charged C and D asked the Defendant to call for the regulation of the above game by speaking to the Defendant, and call for the Defendant to call for the regulation of the above game, when the F police officers were subject to regulation by violating the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the F police officers in the game room were confiscated from 01:30 on Jan. 18, 2009, when the game room was operated as a club business without permission in the following city E (hereinafter “instant game room”).

At the time, the defendant was in a close relationship with the police officer H, who is the leader of the Gambol F police station Gambol-si, while working as the team leader of organized violence in Ysan-si.

At around 12:00 on the same day, the Defendant told the above C that “I would prepare for a police officer of the F police station and talk in order to crack down on the fact that he had been a police officer of the F police station,” and received cash worth KRW 10 million from the above C in front of the Defendant’s birth in I at 19:30 on the same day before the Defendant’s birth in the 19:30 on the same day.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the cases handled by public officials.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted on January 18, 2009, and around 19:00, there was a fact that he met C in front of the Defendant’s Dong living together, who was located in the following city I, but he did not receive KRW 10 million from the Defendant.

Defendant stated to the effect that “C received KRW 10 million from C and delivered the said money to H” at the time of the J coffee shop in the Jeonju-si of March 2009. However, this only requested C to speak as above for the purpose of hiding the fact that C used the said money to D, and made such remarks accordingly.

3. Determination

A. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, D police and the prosecutor’s office that the Defendant had a KRW 10 million for the purpose of controlling at the time and place specified in the instant facts charged.

arrow