The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The lower court, as indicated in its holding, determined the punishment by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant and the unfavorable circumstances, and the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal are also deemed to have been already reflected in the sentencing process

There is no special change in circumstances that may change the punishment of the court below in the trial.

Comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, health status, criminal records, and the details thereof (the re-offending period is the period of repeated crime due to the same type of crime), the attitude and nature of the offense in the investigative agency and the court, the motive, means and consequence of the offense, and the circumstances after the commission of the offense, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the lower court and the oral argument in the party deliberation, such as the circumstances after the commission of the offense, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.