The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence of a fine of three million won imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant recognized the facts charged of the instant case and reflects the Defendant’s mistake, and even though the Defendant had no criminal record exceeding the same kind of or fine for negligence, it is recognized that the instant crime is highly likely to be detrimental to the society, such as undermining the sound sex culture and good morals, and the Defendant’s degree of participation in the instant crime is significant as a manager of a sexual traffic business establishment.

The court below appears to have determined punishment by fully taking into account the favorable circumstances for the defendant, and there is no special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the court below was sentenced, and considering various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.