logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.04.20 2017고단28
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch on April 29, 2009, and on April 15, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating road traffic law (drinking driving) at the Jeonju District Court’s Full Eup branch.

Although the Defendant had had a history of driving alcohol twice or more as above, on December 15, 2016, at around 00:05, the Defendant driven a B-A-di vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.094% from the road front of the e-mail terminal located in E-richeon-ro, Leecheon-do to the front day of the same city-ri-ri-ro.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Making a statement on the circumstances of driving a drinking and inquiring about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (report on criminal records of the suspect);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Consideration under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of small amount of punishment (a favorable circumstance, such as a violation of a mistake, a violation of a mistake, a violation of a fine, a violation of a violation of a law, or a violation of a law, and a violation of a law);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered for repeated consideration in favor of the foregoing);

1. Surveillance of protection, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

arrow