1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. The attached appraisal marks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, among the land size of 1515 square meters in Seosan-si.

1. On August 3, 2012, the Defendant, with the indication of the claim, leased each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) from the Plaintiff as of August 3, 2012, with the lease deposit of KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 800,000 (excluding value-added tax), and the lease period of August 20, 2017.

The Defendant occupied the instant building by installing and managing an office (attached Form No. 1), air conditioners (2), and factories (the same appraisal map). From May 2013 to September 2013, and from January 2014 to October 2016, the Defendant delayed 8720,000 won out of monthly rent, and without the Plaintiff’s approval, constructed housing facilities in the instant building.

Therefore, pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of the above lease agreement, the Plaintiff terminated the above lease agreement by serving a duplicate of the complaint of this case, and sought against the Defendant for unjust enrichment by the removal of each of the above facilities, delivery of the building of this case, overdue rent, and delivery of the building of this case.

2. Judgment based on the deemed confession based on recognition (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).