The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following factors: (a) the Defendant acquired property from a large number of victims more than 20 times; (b) the sum of defraudeds exceeds KRW 83,00,000; (c) the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment several times; and (d) the Defendant again committed the instant fraud even after having been sentenced several times; (b) the victim of the crime of fraud was punished as a tool for other fraud; (c) the victim of the crime of fraud was habitually punished on October 11, 2012 and was sentenced two years and six months; (d) the execution of the punishment was completed on August 20, 2014; and (e) the Defendant was committed again on August 20, 2014; and (e) the Defendant did not recover from damage; and (e) the factors favorable to the punishment, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, motive of the Defendant’s environment; and (e) the Defendant’s motive for committing the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances that led to changes in the sentencing guidelines of the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 32 (1) 3 and Article 25 (3) 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (where the scope of the defendant's liability for compensation is unclear, it is not clear). It is so decided as per Disposition.