1. All of the lawsuits of this case that have been changed in exchange in the trial shall be dismissed;

2. The total cost of the lawsuit.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that: (a) the Plaintiff participated in embezzlement for the long time at the J’s staff of the Appointed Co., Ltd.; (b) the representative director of the Defendant C and the Defendant F Co., Ltd., and the Defendant G were involved in the act of embezzlement for the long time; and (c) the Defendant G and the above K filed a false tax return; (d) Defendant G submitted false documents to the court or made a false statement; and (e) Defendant C filed a false tax return; and (e) the Defendants were co-offenders or aids of the above J et al., the principal offender as the principal offender, in the course and outcome of the process; and (b) the Plaintiff seek partial claims for the payment of the amount

2. Regarding the legitimacy of this part of the lawsuit concerning the claim for monetary payment among the primary claim and the conjunctive claim, even if examining the reasoning of the lawsuit, the complaint and the preparatory documents submitted by the Plaintiff, etc., the above Defendants’ specific participation in embezzlement and embezzlement cannot be specified as to what act the Defendants interfered with the Plaintiff’s exercise of rights, and thus, it cannot specify the cause of damages and the amount of damages arising therefrom. Thus, the lawsuit

3. Regarding the legitimacy of this part of the conjunctive claim, the Plaintiff sought performance of the duty to file a revised return on value-added tax, performance of the duty to remove the state of interference with the exercise of the right to claim for correction (tax evasion), revocation of and performance of the duty to correct fraudulent act equivalent to the amount of value-added tax on disguised transactions and the amount of penalty tax. However, even if the Plaintiff’s claim is examined with the complaint, brief, etc. submitted by the Plaintiff, the subject matter of the lawsuit cannot be specified solely, and the Plaintiff’s claim cannot be seen as a legitimate claim under the current law because there is no appropriate entry as to the cause