Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2017, at around 20:55, the Defendant: (a) reported to the Busan East-gu master’s degree 34 Dok-ro 17, a master’s degree; (b) sent to the Busan East-gu Police Station B by a slope C belonging to the Busan East-gu Police Station B, upon receipt of a report that he/she is crossing the road under the influence of alcohol, presented his/her identification card; and (c) expressed his/her identification card upon request for personal information; and (d) urged the said C to return home from the said C, the Defendant expressed his/her desire to “this dog, ice guk-bee-bee-bee-bee-be,” and (d) was unable to board the said C’s chest by hand due to the defect that D, who was called together, tried to board the vehicle.

After that, at around 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender who interfered with the performance of the above official duties and was escorted to the BJ office located in Busan Eastdong-gu, Busan around 21:15 on the same day, the Defendant expressed to the police officer “Nice,” and expressed to the B police officer who was affiliated with the B B, the Defendant requested to change the balance of water and f to the B guard, and f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to sat

As a result, the defendant has committed violence to protect the lives, bodies and property of police officers, and to prevent, suppress, and investigate crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of C and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

1. the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38 Section 1 Section 2 of the Criminal Code, which shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has no record of the same kind or suspension of execution of official duties, and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is not so heavy, and the defendant appears to have recognized and reflected the facts of the crime as a substitute since the investigation agency, and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties.