logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.03.29 2018고단49
변호사법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

356,465,210 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2014, the Defendant made contact with the representative director F and management directors G for the purpose of manufacturing and installing environmental equipment in Gwangju-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, and demanded that the Defendant receive installation works for non-point pollution reduction facilities ordered by H Gun through business such as solicitation or arrangement for public officials in charge of H Gun. Accordingly, the Defendant demanded that the price be changed later.

After that, the Defendant was selected as a public legal entity to install non-point pollution reduction facilities around November 2014 through such business as solicitation, solicitation, or arrangement for public officials in charge of H Gun (ju). Ultimately, on November 2015, the Defendant made it possible to receive the “I non-point pollution reduction facilities-standard contract for purchase of goods for non-point pollution reduction facilities” equivalent to KRW 2.1 billion of the contract amount around November 2015. In return, the Defendant received KRW 145,050,000 from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account on July 17, 2015, received KRW 85,705,705,210 from Defendant’s former bank account on November 20, 2015, and received KRW 2.10 billion from Defendant’s former bank account on June 6, 2016, Defendant 2006, Defendant’s deposit account on June 6, 2017, Defendant 2008.

As a result, the defendant received total of KRW 356,465,210 on four occasions under the pretext of solicitation or good offices on the affairs handled by public officials in charge of H Gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor to the F, G, and J;

1. Public announcement of basic and shop design services (including instructions to perform tasks), public announcement of bidding for facility construction, bidding results of facility construction works, bidding results, application of each on-site photograph, technical agreement, each information on financial transactions, and each standard contract for purchase of goods to the statutes governing the contract;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 111 (1) (including attorneys-at-law who choose a sentence) of the Act and the selection of imprisonment;

1. After Article 116 of the Additional Collection Attorney Act, the Defendant asserts to the effect that he received the instant money from K in this case.

arrow