Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:30 on October 11, 2016, the Defendant expressed a desire to pay the drinking value from F in the circumstances belonging to the Jeju East Police Station E zone of the Jeju Police Station E zone where the Defendant received the notification of 112 that there was a customer who does not pay the food at the D’s restaurant located in C at Jeju, and expressed that “I am, n, n, n, n, n, n, h, n, n, n, n, n, e., h., the police)’s face of the above F(37 years of age), the victim who worn a massage, n.e., n., n., n., n.e., n., n., n., n.e., the victim

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 Reporting Cases, and at the same time, the victim was injured by blood from a skin who could not know the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. Detention at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances:

The favorable circumstances: (a) the facts of the instant crime are recognized and considered to have been committed; (b) there is no previous conviction except for a fine for a drunk driving in 2009; and (c) two times a fine for a minor fine in 1990s; (b) there is no previous conviction; and (c) there is no serious degree of damage inflicted by a police officer; (d) the degree of damage inflicted by a police officer was disadvantageous: (e) the commission of the instant crime was committed by disregarding public authority on the ground that a police officer was under the influence of alcohol; and (e) the commission of the instant crime, such as taking a person in a superior position, was bad in the course of the crime; and (e) other reasons such as the motive