1. Defendant D’s KRW 60,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from March 1, 2018 to November 14, 2018, and the following:

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 7, 2018, Defendant B, the president of the E Council member, and Defendant D, the administrative staff, as joint and several suretys, borrowed KRW 60,000,000 from the Plaintiff (the evidence, specific contents are as follows; hereinafter “the loan certificate of this case”).

Principal: The date and time of borrowing gold 0 million won (60,000,000 won): the first day of payment - the second day of the date at which the loan certificate is affixed 30,000,000; the second day of the second day of the date when the document proving the mutual terms and conditions of the contract between the two parties and E members below 30,000,000

3. The debtor shall borrow the above money on the condition of the operation and employment of the F Building E members of the F Building owned by the plaintiff (two persons, G, H, etc.).

In the event that the sale price of the above 5,6th floor is paid to the creditor upon completion of the sale of the above 5,6th floor, the debtor is also recognized as having paid the above amount in lieu of the debt by the debtor who incurred the debt of KRW 30,000,000 out of the above 30,000 out of the monthly rent subsidies of the above hospital and the above 30,000,000,00

Provided, That the debtor promises to pay the above amount to the creditor immediately if he/she is employed by the above two persons and fails to work for the second month.

B. The Plaintiff deposited KRW 30,00,000,000 in Defendant B’s account and KRW 60,00,000 in total on February 12, 2018.

(c)

However, doctors H did not work at the above hospital during February 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. If the signature affixed to the document to determine the claim against Defendant B is printed out by his/her seal, barring any special circumstance, the establishment of the authenticity of the seal imprint, i.e., the act of affixing the seal, based on the intent of the preparing person’s name. On the other hand, if the authenticity of the seal imprint is presumed to be established, the authenticity of the document is presumed to be established. Such presumption is based on a person other than the preparing person’s name.