logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2020.11.20 2018허6481
권리범위확인(특)
Text

The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

All costs of litigation shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Name of the instant patent invention (No. 2) 1: D wave structure: D wave energy: Structures caisson installed on the coast, etc. for the purpose of extinguishing the wave energy: A concrete structure manufactured in the form of upper or a passage, which is commonly used as a structure such as the foundation of a bridge, breakwater, and sloping wall, etc., which normally sitd down in the water: Date of application 2) / Date of registration / Number of registration / E/ F/G3 patentee: the Plaintiffs;

B. The invention subject to confirmation of the invention subject to confirmation shall be conducted by the plaintiffs, and its description and drawings shall be as shown in the attached Form.

C. Prior Invention 1) Prior Invention 1 (No. 5) is related to the English standard BS 6349-2: 1988 published on June 19, 2003, which is the provision on implementation of marine structures. 2) Prior Invention 2 (No. 6) prior invention 2 (Evidence 6) published on October 11, 2003, published on the Korean Patent Gazette 40154 published on October 11, 2003.

3) Prior Invention 3 (No. 7 Evidence) published on September 25, 2002 regarding the "small-wave rinks and small-wave structures" published on the Japanese Patent Gazette No. 2002-275855, which was published on September 25, 2002. 4) Prior Invention 4 (Evidence No. 8) is about the "water purification facilities surrounding the body" published on April 20, 199 by the Japanese Patent Gazette No. 11-10467, published on April 20, 199.

5) Prior invention 5 is a prior invention that is additionally submitted in the instant lawsuit. (B) On August 26, 2005, the prior invention 5 is a prior invention that is included in the Korean Patent Gazette No. 10-2005-83510, which is disclosed on August 26, 2005. (c) The reasons for the procedure are as follows: (a) the Plaintiffs against the Defendant on August 18, 2015, the challenged Claim No. 2015-Ma4292 against the Defendant; and (b) each claim of the instant patent invention No. 1 through No. 6, 10, and 11 among the claims of the instant patent invention.

arrow