Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around September 13, 2014, around 09:35, around 09:35, the victim E (the 38-year-old age) operated in Ma was drunk and demanded to open the door of 607 room by asserting that the Defendant’s wife was the leased room by the Defendant’s wife under the influence of alcohol.

Therefore, since the victim is unable to accurately understand the identity of the defendant A, the defendant A explained that he can open a door with the lessee of the above room, and the defendant A used the victim's back part of the victim's back, and used the victim's assault by breaking the back part of the victim's body.

Defendant

B, in combination with Defendant A, the victim “I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son, I am son,” and the victim am son.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly committed violence to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police officers and prosecutor's protocol of statement regarding E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendants committed the instant crime even though they committed the same kind of violent crimes several times.

However, considering the fact that the Defendants reflect the instant crime, agreed with the victims, and appears to have committed the instant crime by contingently, it would be too harsh to sentence the Defendants to imprisonment.

Therefore, a fine like the disposition is sentenced.