1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: (a) No. 4 of the first instance court's decision No. 16 stated that "the image alone" should be stated in the lease agreement for No. 206 of the instant commercial building which was submitted at the video and the L auction procedure; (b) stated "the office and its ancillary business" as "the office and its ancillary business"; and (c) stated in the building registration column for No. 206 of the instant commercial building as "the second floor No. 1315.28§³ and business facilities (general restaurants)" in the building registration column for No. 206 of the commercial building; and (d) it can be confirmed that the Defendants visited the management office of the instant commercial building and confirmed whether the business restriction obligation is stipulated in the business restriction rules (Evidence No. 6 of the instant commercial building). Thus, this is identical to the reasoning of the first instance court's judgment, except for adding "the mere fact that the Defendants visited

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.