The judgment of the court below is reversed.

As to the crime of Article 1 of the judgment of the defendant, the crime of Article 2 of the judgment shall be punished by imprisonment for two months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant asserts that there was an error of misunderstanding of facts as to perjury under paragraph (2) of the judgment of the court below for the following reasons.

1) The part responding to whether an adult amusement room, "F Gameland," was operated as a club business, was not self-sufficient, and the defendant merely signed and sealed the agreement as a partner upon the request of E in order to help E to help E who is not the president of the monthly salary, and then signed and sealed the agreement and the promissory note for the return of investment to G and H. The fact that the defendant is not a partner or joint manager of the entertainment room is not in a relationship of share in the agreement, but was not involved in the accounting, settlement, and operation of the entertainment room in the course of the entertainment room, and in the process of arranging the entertainment room, E did not take all the proceeds of the entertainment. Accordingly, the defendant's testimony that "at the time of signing the agreement on the business, but did not play a role of the president who received the above 00.1 billion won later, it does not constitute a false answer to the extent that the defendant received 0.10 won later from the E.100 won for 10.205.100 won."

Therefore, the above questions are not referred to.

shall not have been effective for six months.