All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding the Defendant’s case in light of the records, the lower court is justifiable to have rejected the assertion on the mental and physical weakness of the Defendant and the requester for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the sentence is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding the request for attachment order in light of the record, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, has the risk of recidivism and recidivism of sexual crime against the Defendant

In light of the above, it is just to maintain the judgment of the first instance ordering the attachment of an electronic tracking device for ten years, and there is no violation of law as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.