Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 25, 2014, at least 15:20, the Defendant insultingd the victim E (here, 20 years of age) at the “D’s cell phone store operated by the Defendant in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “D’s cell phone store”), and when the victim E (here, 20 years of age) found the victim F along with his/her prone F, and the F demanded refund from the cell phone heart chip opened at his/her place, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly booming the victim on several occasions, such as “ception years, bit of a bitch, where a bit of a bitch, bit of a bit of a bitch, and bit of a bit of a bitch,” and “I will d

2. At around 15:32 on the same day, the Defendant expressed his desire to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the crime of insult for the foregoing reason, and assaulted by the Defendant, i.e., a slope of the Seoul Mine Police Station H District, which was called the Defendant’s residence in Gwangjin-gu Seoul, with the report of 112 in front of the Defendant’s residence in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the same day, the Defendant tried to arrest the Defendant as an offender in the crime of insult.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the arrest of the police officer in the above crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, E, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The assertion that the public performance of the offense of insult is not recognized;

A. The Defendant and the defense counsel stated that the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to do so in a timely manner, but at that time, the Defendant and the defense counsel did not appear outside the Chinese student F, customer 1, dispatched police officers, and the Defendant’s wife, which were committed with the victim at that time. This may be disseminated to an unspecified or many unspecified persons.