logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.02.02 2015고단1186
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 1186]

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a e-mail-man car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 3km alcohol concentration of about 0.104% from the 3km section from the front of the Hyundai apartment located in Jinju-si, Jin-si to the front of the “D” apartment located in the same city of Si around that time.

B. On February 24, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Jinwon District Court’s Jinju branch on February 24, 2015, and on October 5, 2015, the Defendant was found to have violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions, such as detection by drinking as above (a).

On November 3, 2015, the Defendant driven the first-hand car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.140% from the 1km section from around 20:55 to the front road of the members affiliated with the Korea Community Welfare Association, located in the same Dong around that time.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, who owns the first passenger car, operated the automobile which was not covered by mandatory insurance as above at the time of the above day.

[2015 Highest 1298]

1. Although Defendant 1 violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions, Defendant 2 driven a e-mail-man car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.073% from the front side of the modern apartment shop in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, around November 30, 2015 to the front side of the elementary major in the early e-mail.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, who owned the first passenger car, operated an automobile that was not covered by mandatory insurance as above at the time of the above day.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 1186]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver (seven pages of investigation records);

arrow