1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts are added to the second part of the judgment of the first instance. "The plaintiff added "the results of physical appraisal to the H court chief of the first instance court" in the second part of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of "the results of physical appraisal to the H court chief of the first instance court" to "the results of physical appraisal to the H court chief of the first instance court" as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance court. In addition, the plaintiff has already been suffering from a mental treatment due to a friendly certificate due to the euls by the multiple eulsic emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive emulsive esive emulsive emulsive e.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages and limitation on liability;

A. According to the above facts, it is reasonable to view that the plaintiff suffered from the harm caused by the accident in this case caused by the negligence of the defendant vehicle. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damage caused by the accident in this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s negligence should be considered as 10% in light of the background, location, and process of the instant accident prior to offsetting negligence. 2) In the event that the act of limiting liability caused by the multiple sub-compact resulting from the multiple sub-compact and the causes on the part of the victim were caused or expanded as a result of the competition between the two factors, even though the factors on the part of the victim were irrelevant to the cause on the part of the victim, such as the physical nature of the relevant disease or the risk of the disease, if compensating the perpetrator for the entire damages in light of the form and degree of the relevant disease, etc. goes against the principle of comparative negligence, the court shall determine the amount of damages and apply by analogy the legal principle of comparative negligence.