1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the part of the United States currency ordering payment below.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s primary assertion 1) The Defendant, around July 7, 201, shall submit to the Plaintiff a debt certificate No. 1 attached hereto (a debt certificate; hereinafter “instant debt certificate”).

)을 작성하여 주었는바, 피고는 원고에게 이 사건 채무확인서에 기한 약정금으로서 이 사건 채무확인서에 기재된 금액 중 미합중국 통화 1,816,798.99달러(이하 달러로 표시한 금액은 모두 미합중국 통화를 가리킨다) 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다. 2) 예비적 주장 원고는 피고를 대위하여 주식회사 대우인터내셔널(이하 ‘대우인터내셔널’이라 한다)에게 알루미늄괴(塊){Aluminium Ingot} 대금의 정산금 및 그 지연이자를 변제하기 위하여 합계 1,816,798.99달러를 지출하였는바, 피고는 원고에게 위 대위변제를 위한 지출에 따른 구상금으로서 1,816,798.99달러 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.

B. Defendant’s assertion 1) As to the Plaintiff’s primary assertion, the instant debt certificate is a forged document or a document prepared in collusion with the Plaintiff by D, which was the Defendant’s representative director. 2) As to the Plaintiff’s preliminary assertion, the Plaintiff did not have to pay the amount of settlement of the price of Alger’s oil and interest in arrears by subrogation of the Defendant.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's primary claim

A. As the instant debt certificate is presumed to have been authentic for the following reasons, the burden of proving that the instant debt certificate was forged is attributable to the Defendant.

The evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to recognize that the debt certificate of this case was forged, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

1. In full view of the shape of evidence No. 1, evidence Nos. 2, 3, and evidence No. 1, the whole purport of the pleadings is as follows.