logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.06.04 2019나11869
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “The subsidy of KRW 4,050,000” in two parallels of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the total subsidy of KRW 25,276,290” in addition to “the portion of the subsidy of KRW 25,276,290” in the judgment of the court of first instance citing it as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding the plaintiff's assertion stated between 6 and 16 is reversed as follows.

B. (1) Determination is based on the following circumstances: (i) the Defendant operated the Plaintiff kindergarten as the husband of the Plaintiff kindergarten after 1999, which was established by the Plaintiff kindergarten, from August 11, 201, on the part of the Plaintiff kindergarten’s secretary, and (ii) the Defendant, D, the five teachers of the Plaintiff kindergarten, the five students of the Plaintiff kindergarten, the 70 students’ parents, and the three personnel in charge of the Yangsan District Office of Education were present on August 16, 201; (iii) the Defendant was working for the Plaintiff kindergarten on behalf of the head of the Plaintiff kindergarten from August 11, 201; and (iv) the Plaintiff was working for the Plaintiff’s kindergarten, such as the Plaintiff’s parents’ right to receive education; (iv) the Plaintiff’s right to receive the Plaintiff’s right to receive education; and (v) the Defendant was working for the Plaintiff’s parents’ right to receive the Plaintiff’s right to receive the education expenses; and (v) the Defendant was working for the Plaintiff’s parents’s right to receive the Plaintiff.

arrow