The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant continued to drive 500 meters or more without recognizing the fact of the accident by facing the head of the vehicle due to the traffic accident in this case by causing a serious loss of memory on the vehicle. Therefore, even though the defendant did not have a criminal intent to escape, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal, and the court below rejected the defendant's assertion in detail with a detailed statement of the defendant's assertion and its judgment under the title "the judgment on the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion". In light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the court below's decision on the facts and its reasoning are just and acceptable even in the case of the party's trial, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts or by misunderstanding legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.