logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.05.15 2018고단7291
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The evidence in 2018, No. 4229 of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, which has been seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 3, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million at the Incheon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On March 3, 2010, the Defendant had a record of being issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Incheon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

[2018 Highest 7291] Although the Defendant had been able to violate the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol twice or more, the Defendant driven a Mariba car in the state of under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.097% alcohol level from the roads near the potter-gun Office located in Michuhol-gu Incheon on September 30, 2018 to the roads front of the Michuhol-gu Incheon B apartment, Michuhol-gu, Incheon.

[2018 Highest8285]

1. A theft Defendant: (a) around 14:05 on Nov. 16, 2018, around 14:05, carried the victim F with one cell phone, Samsung Card, one Korean card, one post office corporate card, and one driver’s license in the E-free shop located in Incheon D, with the market value of KRW 800,000,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On November 16, 2018, the Defendant, at the Haryaryary border in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, through which the victim’s name was unknown at the Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon and through which the Defendant purchased one while settling the price of KRW 60,00,00,000, the Defendant acquired the F-owned credit card, as described in paragraph (1), by suggesting the F-owned credit card as one’s own, thereby making the said payment by fraud.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, while paying the same amount as stated in Paragraph 2 at the date and place described in Paragraph 2, presented the stolen credit card to him as if he was the person having the right to use the said card, and used a stolen credit card by allowing him to settle the amount of KRW 60,000,000.

[2018 Highest 8957]

1. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) even though he had been punished twice or more due to driving under the influence of alcohol as above.

arrow