1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2.In the trial, the trial shall be held.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for addition of the following additional determination, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 changed from the trial of the court of first instance as recognized by the first instance judgment that the Defendant would pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 50,67,58 of the Plaintiff’s business funds to the new bank account and the DNA bank account in which the Defendant personally used KRW 50,67,558. Meanwhile, the Defendant is obligated to return the said money to the Plaintiff. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she

In addition, the Defendant’s children listen to approximately 14 months of lecture in P operated by the O, and paid 8-month lecture fees with the funds of the instant fish driving school, which constitutes KRW 1,192,00 (i.e., monthly tuition fees of KRW 149,00 x 8-month). The Defendant also paid the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 1,192,00 corresponding to the eight-month lecture fees (i.e., monthly tuition fees of KRW 149,00). In addition, while withdrawing from the fish driving school of this case, the Defendant spreads malicious questions about the instant fish driving school, and led the Plaintiff to retire accompanied by the instructors of the instant fish driving school, and caused enormous business damages. The Plaintiff’s business damages caused by the Defendant’s tort are above KRW 150,00,000,000 to KRW 150,000,000 to KRW 369,369,50,757,971,7500).