A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant worked as the head of the insurance company in the transfer, and the victim B is a same team employee and he/she becomes aware of.

1. On August 14, 2014, the Defendant is entitled to the share of the factory to be acquired by the victim in the vicinity of the hill station of the subway No. 2, the subway around August 14, 2014.

If a loan is lent from a lender as it is necessary to pay a higher level, if he/she receives a loan from the lender, he/she will pay the loan in full and pay the loan, if he/she receives a share by acquiring a factory on or around September of the same year.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have been selected as a factory to accept, and since it is necessary to prevent so-called return due to the above debt such as the above electricity, there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim

Nevertheless, on August 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 2.8 million from his own bank account in his name on the pretext of borrowing money from the victim; and (c) received a total of eight times from around that time to October 27, 2014, including a total of KRW 20,70 million from around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired the victim's property by fraud.

2. On September 2014, the Defendant would offer the victim a monthly salary of KRW 1.5 million to the victim at the fourth floor D office of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, and the victim’s “A multi-level company will provide the victim with a monthly salary of KRW 1.5 million, if he/she provides the services, such as

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay monthly salary normally even if he employs a victim and conducts management work due to the above financial situation.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to work at D company from that time until December 2014, the Defendant did not pay KRW 6,000,000,000 for the total amount of 1.5 million monthly salary, even though he/she had the victim work at D company from that time to December 2014.