All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance which found Defendant C guilty on the ground that there is no proof of crime as to the fact of taking good offices around March 2008 among the facts charged in this case against Defendant C, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted Defendant C as to taking good offices around March 2008 and taking good offices around January 2008, among the facts charged in this case against Defendant C, and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance which found Defendant C guilty on the ground that there is no proof of crime against Defendant C among the facts charged in this case against Defendant C. It is justifiable to reverse the part of the judgment of the court of first instance which found Defendant C guilty and acquitted Defendant C. There is no violation of the principle of free conviction in violation of logical and empirical rules, contrary to the assertion of the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the entire judgment of the court below, but there is no specific reason in the petition of appeal as to the guilty portion against Defendant B, and there is no reason of appeal as to the reasoning of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.