1. Defendant Republic of Korea confirms that real estate stated in the attached list is owned by Defendant B.

2. The defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. The former land cadastre drawn up at the time of the Japanese occupation occupation at the time of Japanese occupation (hereinafter “instant land”). The former land cadastre, written as “Sacheon-gun Cand 45 square meters” (hereinafter “the land was entered as the land in the attached list following the change of administrative district after the change of administrative district, etc.”) was written as being the circumstance to the person who is a resident B on November 10, 1913.

B. In the building ledger, a wooden house of 24.4 square meters on the instant land (alonged, cement brick building building is currently reconstructed; hereinafter “instant house”) is written in the name of the owner, etc. of the Plaintiff in 1945.

C. The Plaintiff is registered as having continued to reside in the instant land since November 28, 1968, which was prepared by the first resident registration record card.

At present, there is no evidence to identify the identity of “B” in the old land cadastre.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 2-2, Eul evidence 1, and fact-finding with respect to the private market of this court

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 3-1 to No. 6 of the judgment as to the claim against Defendant B, it can be acknowledged that the Plaintiff purchased it from E who occupied and used the land and the house of this case since the 1968s, and received it, and continues to occupy and use it until now.

An occupant is presumed to have occupied in good faith, peace, and public performance with his/her own intent under Article 197(1) of the Civil Act. If the registrant is the same during the period of acquisition, it is sufficient to view the starting point of the acquisition as at where the starting point of the acquisition between the holders can be claimed for the completion of acquisition and to confirm the expiration

The Plaintiff, at least from 1968, occupied and used the instant land and buildings with its intention to own them, and even if the commencement date of January 1, 1990, which was the time of his own possession, was 20 years thereafter.