Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 2 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants and victims E (n.e., age 56) are the relationship between the Defendants and the victims with the knowledge of the fraternity group.

On April 10, 2017, the Defendants: (a) around G 19:00 around 19:0, the G main store located in Chuncheon City F, for the reason that the victim took the examination of the Defendant A and had the examination, and (b) the Defendant A was in conflict with each other; (c) Defendant B continued to be in sprinking the victim’s candle with both descendants; and (d) Defendant B was faced with the wall where the victim’s hair was behind the victim’s head.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up the victim about two weeks of treatment, which requires multiple scambry, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and H;

1. A copy of a medical certificate or medical record;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (the result of the verification of CCTV on the site);

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 2 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 of the same Act, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;

1. Determination as to the Defendants and their defense counsel’s assertion under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which costs of lawsuit

1. Summary of the assertion

A. Defendant A did not have any flabbbbage of the victim, and even if he did not have any flabbbbage

Even if there is no responsibility for the injury of the victim.

B. Defendant B did not have any civil defense of the victim.

2. However, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, the victim and witness H were consistent with the victim and witness H on the day of the instant case, the Defendants found the victim’s spare in accordance with the standards, and were in dispute with the victim in front of the stand, and Defendant B, who was next to the victim, was spare spared with the victim’s hand and spare spared.

“A defect,” and Defendant B’s chest was subsequently the victim’s head while pushing the victim’s chest.