beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. Special injury Defendant: “D main points” located in the parking lot of the Si, Jinyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul on September 17, 2017, and whether “Won-Myeon” from the victim E (tax age 61);
No. 10 is satisfyer than 10.
“At the time of hearing the word “,” the victim’s entrance has reached a knife with a knife with a knife after a knifeing the knife, which is a dangerous object from the knife to the knife.
In this respect, the defendant carried with a shoulderer's disease, which is a dangerous object, and carried out a net prize of the days of treatment to the victim.
2. On September 17, 2017, at the C market parking lot located in front of the “D week” set forth in paragraph (1) around September 17, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim E at one time, who stated, “I do not have any flick with the flick flick flick flick, and there is no flick flick flick flick flick.”
3. On September 24, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and damages to public goods, at the office of the staff of the Guns of the Guns of the Republic of Korea located in the 11111 in the salary-ro 101 in the salary-to-Eup, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do on September 24, 2017, on the ground that the public officials on duty forced the Defendant to live together, but the public officials on duty did not properly take out the Defendant’s talk, while leaving TV, while serving on duty, and the public officials G belonging to the YOFF and its affiliated public officials “slick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick.”
“On the other hand, at the same time, 42 LG TV with a market value of 1.5 million won at that place, and the telephone machine with a market value of 100,000 won at the bottom was put on G.
Accordingly, the Defendant, by assaulting and threatening public officials, interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties, and at the same time damaged the said TV and telephone systems used by public offices.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's statement in court;